What Can Be Recovered Under Sparse Adversarial Corruption? Assumption-Free Theory for Linear Measurements

arXiv:2510.24215v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recovery from linear measurements under sparse adversarial corruption is typically formulated as an exact-recovery problem: one seeks structural conditions on $A$ (e.g., the restricted isometry property) that guarantee unique recovery of $x^\star$ from $y = A x^\star + e$ with $\left\lVert e \right\rVert_0 \leq q$. However, in practice, these conditions are rarely met and are hard to verify, and so the existing guarantees provide no guidance once exact recovery fails. This limitation obscures even simple robustness phenomena -- for instance, repeated rows in $A$ can preserve nontrivial information about $x^\star$ under sparse corruption. In this paper, we address the more general question: for arbitrary $A \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}$, what information about $x^\star$ remains robust in $y$ despite any $q$-sparse adversarial corruption $e$? We show that the robust information is precisely $x^\star + \ker(U)$, where $U$ is the orthogonal projection onto the intersection of rowspaces of all submatrices of $A$ obtained by deleting $2q$ rows. This characterization clarifies, for each sparsity level $q$, how the row structure of $A$ determines whether a $q$-sparse $e$ allows exact, partial, or only trivial recovery, thereby extending the standard exact-recovery framework. We further prove that every $x$ that minimizes $\left\lVert y - A x \right\rVert_0$ belongs to $x^\star + \ker(U)$, yielding a constructive approach to recover this set. For i.i.d. Gaussian $A$, we show a sharp phase transition: depending on $m$, $n$, and $q$, either exact recovery holds or no nontrivial recovery is possible. We sketch two applications: robust network tomography and signal reconstruction from oversampled DCT measurements.