Why don't all conferences make reviews public?
I find ICLR public reviews to be very useful :
- I get an idea of how others in the field think about the work
- Makes the publishing process more transparent
- Reviewers will potentially spend more effort to avoid public scrutiny
Are there any drawbacks in having ICLR-like public reviews? (where the reviewer identifies are masked) Would the community benefit if all conferences released their reviews?
[link] [comments]